Questions:bcbcvbcbvb Field Name: Answers: SQL: SELECT * FROM survey_28

Results

No of records in this query: 28 Total records in survey: 28 Percentage of total: 100.00% SQL: SELECT count(*) FROM survey_28

Field Summary for 01-01(CM):
What teaching/learning tools should we look for in a CMS/LMS? [Content management]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	0	0.00%
Low (L)	0	0.00%
Medium (M)	3	10.71%
High (H)	25	89.29%

Field Summary for 01-01(TD):
What teaching/learning tools should we look for in a CMS/LMS? [Threaded discussion]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	2	7.14%
Low (L)	5	17.86%
Medium (M)	6	21.43%
High (H)	15	53.57%

Field Summary for 01-01(EM):
What teaching/learning tools should we look for in a CMS/LMS? [Email]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	0	0.00%
Low (L)	4	14.29%
Medium (M)	13	46.43%
High (H)	11	39.29%

Field Summary for 01-01(CA):
What teaching/learning tools should we look for in a CMS/LMS? [Course announcements]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	0	0.00%
Low (L)	0	0.00%
Medium (M)	8	28.57%
High (H)	20	71.43%

Field Summary for 01-01(CL):
What teaching/learning tools should we look for in a CMS/LMS? [Calendar]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	0	0.00%
Low (L)	5	17.86%
Medium (M)	15	53.57%
High (H)	8	28.57%

Field Summary for 01-01(GM):
What teaching/learning tools should we look for in a CMS/LMS? [Grade management/ Gradebook]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	0	0.00%
Low (L)	2	7.14%
Medium (M)	8	28.57%
High (H)	18	64.29%

Field Summary for 01-01(AS):
What teaching/learning tools should we look for in a CMS/LMS? [Assessment (Tests/Surveys)]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	0	0.00%
Low (L)	0	0.00%
Medium (M)	14	50.00%
High (H)	14	50.00%

Field Summary for 01-01(AM):
What teaching/learning tools should we look for in a CMS/LMS? [Assignment management/Dropbox]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	12	42.86%
Low (L)	1	3.57%
Medium (M)	4	14.29%
High (H)	11	39.29%

Field Summary for 01-01(CH):
What teaching/learning tools should we look for in a CMS/LMS? [Chat]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	0	0.00%
Low (L)	10	35.71%
Medium (M)	17	60.71%
High (H)	1	3.57%

Field Summary for 01-01(WH):
What teaching/learning tools should we look for in a CMS/LMS? [Whiteboard]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	12	42.86%
Low (L)	4	14.29%
Medium (M)	11	39.29%
High (H)	1	3.57%

Field Summary for 01-01(TR):
What teaching/learning tools should we look for in a CMS/LMS? [Tracking student use and progress]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	0	0.00%
Low (L)	3	10.71%
Medium (M)	13	46.43%
High (H)	12	42.86%

Field Summary for 01-01(MA):
What teaching/learning tools should we look for in a CMS/LMS? [Managing student submissions/workload]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	11	39.29%
Low (L)	1	3.57%
Medium (M)	8	28.57%
High (H)	8	28.57%

Field Summary for 01-01(CC):
What teaching/learning tools should we look for in a CMS/LMS? [Content creation (HTML editor, equation editor, WYSWYG)]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	10	35.71%
Low (L)	2	7.14%
Medium (M)	6	21.43%
High (H)	10	35.71%

Field Summary for 01-02(EA):
What key features should we look for in a CMS/LMS? [Ease of posting course content]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	10	35.71%
Low (L)	0	0.00%
Medium (M)	0	0.00%
High (H)	18	64.29%

Field Summary for 01-02(OR):
What key features should we look for in a CMS/LMS? [Ability to organize/modularize course content/presentation]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	12	42.86%
Low (L)	1	3.57%
Medium (M)	2	7.14%
High (H)	13	46.43%

Field Summary for 01-02(EX):
What key features should we look for in a CMS/LMS? [Ability to export/import data (grades, reports, rosters, etc.)]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	11	39.29%
Low (L)	1	3.57%
Medium (M)	3	10.71%
High (H)	13	46.43%

Field Summary for 01-02(CU):
What key features should we look for in a CMS/LMS? [Ability to customize course "look"]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	0	0.00%
Low (L)	4	14.29%
Medium (M)	16	57.14%
High (H)	8	28.57%

Field Summary for 01-02(SO):
What key features should we look for in a CMS/LMS? [Ability to interface with other software (i.e. Maple, Respondus, Examview)]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	10	35.71%
Low (L)	0	0.00%
Medium (M)	8	28.57%
High (H)	10	35.71%

Field Summary for 01-02(PU):
What key features should we look for in a CMS/LMS? [Ability to interface with and availability of course materials from publishers]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	12	42.86%
Low (L)	2	7.14%
Medium (M)	5	17.86%
High (H)	9	32.14%

Field Summary for 01-02(MA):
What key features should we look for in a CMS/LMS? [Ability to include mathematical formulas and symbols]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	15	53.57%
Low (L)	3	10.71%
Medium (M)	4	14.29%
High (H)	6	21.43%

Field Summary for 01-02(LO):
What key features should we look for in a CMS/LMS? [Compliance with learning object standards (SCORM, QTI, IMS)]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	6	21.43%
Low (L)	2	7.14%
Medium (M)	7	25.00%
High (H)	13	46.43%

Field Summary for 02-01(PO):
What features should we look for that we can expand into? [Ability to support a "Portal" entry (different views/access for student, faculty and LMS administrator)]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	5	17.86%
Low (L)	1	3.57%
Medium (M)	14	50.00%
High (H)	8	28.57%

Field Summary for 02-01(EP):
What features should we look for that we can expand into? [Electronic Portfolio capabilities]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	4	14.29%
Low (L)	2	7.14%
Medium (M)	9	32.14%
High (H)	13	46.43%

Field Summary for 02-01(CM):
What features should we look for that we can expand into? [Campus-wide content management (Learning Object repository)]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	3	10.71%
Low (L)	4	14.29%
Medium (M)	9	32.14%
High (H)	12	42.86%

Field Summary for 02-01(AP):
What features should we look for that we can expand into? [Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) to extend capabilities]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	13	46.43%
Low (L)	2	7.14%
Medium (M)	6	21.43%
High (H)	7	25.00%

Field Summary for 03-01(CN):
What other characteristics should we consider in selecting an LMS? [Clarity of navigation]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	0	0.00%
Low (L)	0	0.00%
Medium (M)	1	3.57%
High (H)	27	96.43%

Field Summary for 03-01(EA):
What other characteristics should we consider in selecting an LMS? [Ease of use by faculty, students and LMS administrators]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	0	0.00%
Low (L)	0	0.00%
Medium (M)	0	0.00%
High (H)	28	100.00%

Field Summary for 03-01(CO):
What other characteristics should we consider in selecting an LMS? [Ongoing costs]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	3	10.71%
Low (L)	2	7.14%
Medium (M)	16	57.14%
High (H)	7	25.00%

Field Summary for 03-01(TR):
What other characteristics should we consider in selecting an LMS? [Transitional costs (course conversion, training/retraining required)]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	3	10.71%
Low (L)	5	17.86%
Medium (M)	12	42.86%
High (H)	8	28.57%

Field Summary for 03-01(HO):
What other characteristics should we consider in selecting an LMS? [Hosting onsite/offsite]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	12	42.86%
Low (L)	0	0.00%
Medium (M)	10	35.71%
High (H)	6	21.43%

Field Summary for 03-01(EO):
What other characteristics should we consider in selecting an LMS? [Ease in integrating with other existing systems (Datatel/Web Advisor)]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	2	7.14%
Low (L)	1	3.57%
Medium (M)	7	25.00%
High (H)	18	64.29%

Field Summary for 03-01(MA):
What other characteristics should we consider in selecting an LMS? [Ease of managing administrative support]
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	11	39.29%
Low (L)	0	0.00%
Medium (M)	9	32.14%
High (H)	8	28.57%

Field Summary for 04-01:
Please suggested any other criteria you think should be evaluated.
Answer	Count	Percentage
Answer	8	28.57%
No answer	20	71.43%

Field Summary for 05-01:
Please identify your department from the list below.
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	11	39.29%
Accounting and Business Law (ABL)	0	0.00%
Art and Design (AD)	0	0.00%
Biology (B)	1	3.57%
Chemistry, Medical Technology and Physics (CMTP)	2	7.14%
Communication (C)	0	0.00%
Computer Science (CS)	0	0.00%
Criminal Justice (CJ)	0	0.00%
Curriculum and Instruction (CI)	1	3.57%
Economics and Finance (EF)	0	0.00%
Educational Leadership and Special Education (ELSE)	1	3.57%
English (E)	0	0.00%
Foreign Language Studies (FLS)	0	0.00%
History and Anthropology (HA)	1	3.57%
Management and Marketing (MM)	1	3.57%
Mathematics (MA)	1	3.57%
Music and Theater Arts (MTA)	0	0.00%
Nursing (N)	1	3.57%
Political Science (PS)	2	7.14%
Psychology (P)	0	0.00%
Social Work (SW)	1	3.57%
Software Engineering (SE)	1	3.57%
Other (-oth-)	4	14.29%

Field Summary for 05-02:
Please select your position:
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	11	39.29%
Part-Time/Adjunct (PTA)	0	0.00%
Faculty (P-T) / Admin (PT)	2	7.14%
Full Time Instructor (FTI)	3	10.71%
Visiting Assistant Professor (VAP)	0	0.00%
Specialist Professor (SP)	0	0.00%
Assistant Professor (AP)	4	14.29%
Associate Professor (ASP)	6	21.43%
Professor (PR)	0	0.00%
Other (-oth-)	2	7.14%

Field Summary for 05-03:
Please indicate how long you have been at Monmouth University:
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	11	39.29%
1 - 3 years (1-3)	6	21.43%
4 - 7 years (4-7)	6	21.43%
8 - 10 years (8-10)	1	3.57%
11 - 15 years (11-15)	3	10.71%
16 - 20 years (16-20)	0	0.00%
More than 20 years (20)	1	3.57%

Field Summary for 05-04:
I have been using a CMS for my courses for the following number of semesters:
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	13	46.43%
1 (1)	3	10.71%
2 (2)	1	3.57%
3 - 5 (3-5)	6	21.43%
6 - 9 (6-9)	2	7.14%
10 - 12 (10-12)	2	7.14%
More than 12 (12)	1	3.57%

Field Summary for 05-05:
On average each semester, I use the CMS in ______ % of the courses I teach.
Answer	Count	Percentage
No answer	11	39.29%
0% (ZERO)	3	10.71%
25% (25)	0	0.00%
33% (33)	1	3.57%
50% (50)	2	7.14%
66% (66)	0	0.00%
75% (75)	3	10.71%
100% (100)	7	25.00%
Other (-oth-)	1	3.57%

Field Summary for 05-06:
I have experience using the following CMSs:
Answer	Count	Percentage
Educator (Monmouth University's current CMS) (ED)	14	50.00%
WebCT (WEBCT)	11	39.29%
BlackBoard (BB)	5	17.86%
Desire2Learn (D2L)	0	0.00%
Other	2	7.14%

Field Summary for 05-07:
I have used a CMS to teach the following types of courses:
Answer	Count	Percentage
Undergraduate courses (lower level 100-200) (LL)	8	28.57%
Undergraduate courses (upper level 300-400) (UL)	9	32.14%
Graduate courses (GR)	8	28.57%

Field Summary for 05-08:
I have used a CMS to teach the following formats of courses:
Answer	Count	Percentage
Web-supplemented (posting syllabus and limited content, regular class meeting schedule) (WS)	11	39.29%
Web-enhanced (course syllabus, content and activities/discussions happen online, regular class meeting schedule) (WE)	12	42.86%
Web-hybrid (meeting 3-6 times face-to-face, most class activities online) (WH)	5	17.86%
Fully Online (no more than 1-2 face-to-face meetings, all course interactions happen online) (OL)	4	14.29%